Claude
Skills
Sign in
Back

auto-research

Included with Lifetime
$97 forever

Premier research workflow for systematic investigation, synthesis, and verification. Use for literature reviews, competitive analysis, deep dives, market research, or any task requiring structured research with source attribution.

Productivity

What this skill does


# Auto Research

Systematic research orchestration for pi. Replaces Claude CoWork research workflows with a native pi skill set.

## Workflow

```
Clarify → Investigate → Synthesize → Validate → Output
```

### 1. Clarify Scope

Before researching, confirm with the user:
- What questions need answering?
- What are the boundaries?
- What depth is needed?
- What format for output?

### 2. Investigate

Use the best tool for the source type:

| Source Type | Tool |
|-------------|------|
| Web docs, APIs, current info | `intelli_research` from intelli-search skill |
| Specific URLs | `web_fetch` from pi-browse |
| Local files | `read` |
| Multiple local files | Batch `read` or `rg` |
| GitHub repos | Clone and `read` |

Always use `intelli_research` with a `focusPrompt`. Without it, extractions are generic.

### 3. Synthesize

Organize findings:
- Group by theme or question
- Identify patterns, consensus, debates
- Note contradictions between sources
- Distinguish fact from interpretation

### 4. Validate

- Cross-reference key claims across multiple sources
- Assess source reliability (peer-reviewed > official > journalism > blog > forum)
- Flag uncertainty rather than guessing
- Mark speculative claims as such

### 5. Output

Choose the right output format based on depth needed.

## Output Formats

### Research Brief (Quick)

```markdown
## Research Brief: [Topic]
**Date**: [Date] | **Confidence**: [Level]

### Key Findings
1. [Finding with source]
2. [Finding with source]

### Sources
- [Source](url) - [Brief description]

### Next Steps
- [Follow-up recommendations]
```

### Comprehensive Report (Deep)

```markdown
## [Title]

### Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraph overview]

### Background
[Context and importance]

### Methodology
[How research was conducted]

### Findings
[Detailed with inline citations]

### Analysis
[Interpretation and synthesis]

### Limitations
[Acknowledged constraints]

### References
[Full citations]
```

### Verification Report (Fact-Check)

```markdown
## Verification: [Claim]

**Verdict**: [VERIFIED / PARTIALLY VERIFIED / UNVERIFIED / CONTRADICTED]

### Evidence
| Source | Claim | Confidence |
|--------|-------|------------|
| [Name] | [Quote] | H/M/L |

**Confidence**: [H/M/L with reasoning]
```

## Source Markers

Use inline markers to indicate source type:
- `[A]` Academic / peer-reviewed
- `[O]` Official / government / primary
- `[N]` News / journalism
- `[I]` Industry / technical docs
- `[E]` Expert opinion / blog

## Knowledge Types

Label every factual claim:
- `FACT`: Verifiable with direct source
- `LIKELY`: Consistent with multiple sources
- `SPECULATIVE`: Based on reasoning, not direct evidence
- `UNKNOWN`: Beyond current knowledge, stated clearly

## File Organization

For multi-session research, use this structure:

```
/Research/
└── [Project]/
    ├── 01-sources/      # PDFs, notes, source materials
    ├── 02-analysis/     # Analysis documents
    ├── 03-synthesis/    # Synthesized findings
    └── 04-output/       # Final reports
```

Naming conventions:
- Sources: `YYYY-MM-DD_[topic]_source.[ext]`
- Analysis: `YYYY-MM-DD_[topic]_analysis.md`
- Outputs: `[topic]_report_[version]_[date].md`

## Research Task Templates

### Literature Review
> Analyze all documents in this folder as a literature review on [topic]. For each source, extract: main thesis, methodology, key findings, and how it connects to other sources. Identify consensus and debates.

### Competitive Analysis
> Research [topic/competitor] using all available sources. Create a competitive analysis covering: market position, key offerings, strengths, weaknesses, and differentiation. Include source citations.

### Fact Verification
> Verify the following claims: [list claims]. For each, provide: verification status, supporting evidence, source quality assessment, and confidence level.

### Deep Research
> Conduct comprehensive research on [topic]. Include: executive summary, key findings with source attribution, analysis and implications, limitations and uncertainties, recommendations for further research. Cite all sources with URLs.

Related in Productivity