c-review
Performs comprehensive C/C++ security review for memory corruption, integer overflows, race conditions, and platform-specific vulnerabilities. Use when auditing native C/C++ applications, reviewing daemons or services for memory safety, or hunting integer overflow / use-after-free / race conditions in userspace code.
What this skill does
# C/C++ Security Review
Runs in the main conversation (invoke via `/c-review:c-review`). Orchestrator owns the `Task*` ledger as bookkeeping for retries; workers and judges have no Task tools. Workers and judges are named plugin subagents (`c-review:c-review-worker`, `c-review:c-review-dedup-judge`, `c-review:c-review-fp-judge`); tool sets are declared in `plugins/c-review/agents/*.md`. Findings are exchanged via markdown-with-YAML files in a shared output directory.
## When to Use
Native C/C++ application security review: memory safety, integer overflow, races, type confusion, Linux/macOS daemons, Windows userspace services.
## When NOT to Use
- Kernel drivers/modules (Linux, Windows, macOS).
- Managed languages (Java, C#, Python, Go, Rust).
- Embedded/bare-metal code without libc.
## Subagents
| Subagent type | Purpose | Tool set |
|---|---|---|
| `c-review:c-review-worker` | Run assigned cluster, write findings | Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash |
| `c-review:c-review-dedup-judge` | Merge duplicates (runs **first**) | Read, Write, Edit, Glob |
| `c-review:c-review-fp-judge` | FP + severity + final reports (runs **second**) | Read, Write, Edit, Grep, Glob, Bash |
Tools come from each agent's frontmatter at spawn time. The orchestrator's `Task*`/`Agent`/`Bash`/etc. come from this skill's `allowed-tools`.
---
## Architecture
```
coordinator: write context.md → build_run_plan.py → TaskCreate × M
→ spawn primer (foreground) → spawn M workers (parallel)
→ classify Phase-7 outcomes + write findings-index.txt
→ dedup-judge → fp-judge → SARIF safety net → return REPORT.md
```
Output directory contains: `context.md`, `plan.json`, `worker-prompts/`, `findings/`, `findings-index.d/` (per-worker shards), `findings-index.txt`, `run-summary.md`, `dedup-summary.md`, `fp-summary.md`, `REPORT.md`, `REPORT.sarif`.
**Path convention:** set `${C_REVIEW_PLUGIN_ROOT}=${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}` if that resolves (`Bash: ls "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/prompts/clusters/buffer-write-sinks.md"`), otherwise `Bash: find ~/.claude -path '*/plugins/c-review/prompts/clusters/buffer-write-sinks.md' -print -quit`.
**Scope convention:** keep two scopes separate throughout the run:
- `finding_scope_root` — the user-requested audit subtree. Workers may only file findings whose vulnerable location is inside this subtree.
- `context_roots` — read-only repo roots/files workers and judges may inspect to verify reachability, callers, wrappers, build flags, mitigations, and threat-model details. Default to `.` unless the user explicitly forbids broader context. Reading context outside `finding_scope_root` is allowed; filing findings there is not.
---
## Rationalizations to Reject
- **"Background spawns parallelize the workers."** They do not — `Agent` calls in a single assistant message already run concurrently. `run_in_background=true` defeats the Phase 6a primer cache, so every worker pays full cache-creation (`cache_read_input_tokens=0`) and the ~15 K-token primer is wasted M times. This is the single most common defect — multiple recent runs spawned 7-of-8 (or all) workers with `bg=true`. Default: omit `run_in_background` from worker spawns.
- **"I'll re-derive the cluster list / paths / pass prefixes inline instead of running `build_run_plan.py`."** The script is the only authority for selection and rendering. Paraphrasing it drops fields that the worker self-check requires, producing `worker-N abort: spawn prompt malformed`. Always run the script and `Read plan.json`.
- **"The run partially succeeded — I'll just write `REPORT.md` from what completed."** Hiding partial runs behind a successful report is a correctness bug. If any Phase-5 cluster task is not `completed`, surface it prominently in `run-summary.md` and the final response.
- **"Zero findings — skip Phase 8."** Always run both judges and Phase 8b: dedup-judge writes a minimal no-op `dedup-summary.md` on an empty index, fp-judge writes empty `REPORT.md`/`REPORT.sarif`, and Phase 8b's SARIF generator emits `results: []` for the empty case. SARIF consumers depend on a stable artifact set.
- **"`Bash: ls README*` is fine for the preflight."** Under zsh, an unmatched glob aborts the whole compound command before `2>/dev/null` runs. Use `Glob` (preferred) or `find` (never fails on no-match).
---
## Orchestration Workflow
Run these phases **in the main conversation**.
### Phase 0: Parameter Collection
**Entry:** skill invoked. **Exit:** `threat_model`, `worker_model`, `severity_filter` resolved; `scope_subpath` resolved or set to `"."`; `finding_scope_root=scope_subpath`; `context_roots` resolved.
The skill is invoked directly (no command wrapper). Parse any free-text arguments the user passed on the `/c-review:c-review` line (e.g. `flamenco only`, `high severity only`, `use haiku`) and pre-fill the answers they imply — then ask for any missing required parameters with **one** `AskUserQuestion` call. Never silently default the required parameters.
Required parameters:
| Parameter | Values | How to infer from args |
|---|---|---|
| `threat_model` | `REMOTE` / `LOCAL_UNPRIVILEGED` / `BOTH` | Words like "remote", "network", "attacker" → `REMOTE`; "local", "unprivileged" → `LOCAL_UNPRIVILEGED`; otherwise ask. |
| `worker_model` | `haiku` / `sonnet` / `opus` | Explicit model name in args. Otherwise ask (no silent default). |
| `severity_filter` | `all` / `medium` / `high` | "all", "every", "noisy" → `all`; "medium and above" → `medium`; "high only", "criticals only" → `high`. Otherwise ask — **no silent default**. |
| `scope_subpath` | repo-relative directory (optional) | Phrases like "X only", "just audit X/", "review subdirectory X" → `src/X/` or the matching subdir. Apply fuzzy matching against top-level subdirectories of the repo. If absent, set `"."`; if ambiguous, ask. |
Call `AskUserQuestion` exactly once with only unresolved required parameters (`threat_model`, `worker_model`, `severity_filter`) plus `scope_subpath` only when the user explicitly requested a narrowed scope but it is ambiguous. If the required parameters were all pre-filled and scope is absent or resolved, skip the question.
After resolving `scope_subpath`, set `finding_scope_root="${scope_subpath:-.}"`. Set `context_roots="."` by default so workers can verify callers/build settings outside a narrowed subtree without filing out-of-scope findings. If the user explicitly asks to forbid broader context, set `context_roots="${finding_scope_root}"` and note that reachability confidence may be lower.
### Phase 1: Prerequisites
**Entry:** Phase 0 complete. **Exit:** `is_cpp`, `is_posix`, `is_windows` flags determined.
Probe within `${finding_scope_root:-.}`. Prefer `Glob`/`Grep` when available in the orchestrator's tool set; some sessions only expose `Bash`, so fall back to the equivalents below — both forms produce identical signals (non-empty output ⇒ flag true):
```bash
# is_cpp
find "${finding_scope_root:-.}" -type f \( -name '*.cpp' -o -name '*.cxx' -o -name '*.cc' -o -name '*.hpp' -o -name '*.hh' \) -print -quit
# is_posix
grep -rlE '#include[[:space:]]*<(pthread|signal|sys/(socket|stat|types|wait)|unistd|errno)\.h>' \
--include='*.c' --include='*.h' \
--include='*.cpp' --include='*.cxx' --include='*.cc' --include='*.hpp' --include='*.hh' \
"${finding_scope_root:-.}" | head -1
# is_windows
grep -rlE '#include[[:space:]]*<(windows|winbase|winnt|winuser|winsock|ntdef|ntstatus)\.h>' \
--include='*.c' --include='*.h' \
--include='*.cpp' --include='*.cxx' --include='*.cc' --include='*.hpp' --include='*.hh' \
"${finding_scope_root:-.}" | head -1
```
`compile_commands.json` is informational (no agent currently uses LSP), but the probe is mandatory so the run summary records whether richer local tooling is available. Probe via `Glob: **/compile_commands.json` under `${context_roots}`. If `Glob` is unavailable, use:
```bash
printf '%s\n' "${context_roots:-.}" | tr ',' '\n' | while IFS= read -r root; do
Related in Security
mac-ops
IncludedComprehensive macOS workstation operations — diagnose kernel panics, identify failing drives, audit launchd startup items, decode wake reasons, triage TCC permission denials, manage APFS snapshots, recover from no-boot. Use for: Mac is slow, slow bootup, won't boot, kernel panic, kernel_task hot, mds_stores CPU, photoanalysisd, cloudd, login loop, gray screen, sleep wake failure, drive failing, IO errors, APFS snapshots eating space, Time Machine local snapshots, Spotlight indexing, launchd, LaunchAgent, LaunchDaemon, login items, TCC permissions, Full Disk Access, Screen Recording denied, Gatekeeper, quarantine, com.apple.quarantine, app is damaged, helper tool, /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools, pmset, wake reasons, dark wake, sysdiagnose, panic.ips, DiagnosticReports, configuration profile, MDM profile, remote diagnostics over SSH.
a11y-audit
IncludedRun accessibility audits on web projects combining automated scanning (axe-core, Lighthouse) with WCAG 2.1 AA compliance mapping, manual check guidance, and structured reporting. Output is configurable: markdown report only, markdown plus machine-readable JSON, or markdown plus issue tracker integration. Use this skill whenever the user mentions "accessibility audit", "a11y audit", "WCAG audit", "accessibility check", "compliance scan", or asks to check a web project for accessibility issues. Also trigger when the user wants to verify WCAG conformance or map findings to a specific standard (CAN-ASC-6.2, EN 301 549, ADA/AODA).
erpclaw
IncludedAI-native ERP system with self-extending OS. Full accounting, invoicing, inventory, purchasing, tax, billing, HR, payroll, advanced accounting (ASC 606/842, intercompany, consolidation), and financial reporting. 413 actions across 14 domains, 43 expansion modules. Constitutional guardrails, adversarial audit, schema migration. Double-entry GL, immutable audit trail, US GAAP.
assess
IncludedAssesses and rates quality 0-10 across multiple dimensions (correctness, maintainability, security, performance, testability, simplicity) with pros/cons analysis. Compares against project conventions and prior decisions from memory. Produces structured evaluation reports with actionable improvement suggestions. Use when evaluating code, designs, architectures, or comparing alternative approaches.
spring-boot-security-jwt
IncludedProvides JWT authentication and authorization patterns for Spring Boot 3.5.x covering token generation with JJWT, Bearer/cookie authentication, database/OAuth2 integration, and RBAC/permission-based access control using Spring Security 6.x. Use when implementing authentication or authorization in Spring Boot applications.
code-hardcode-audit
IncludedDetect hardcoded values, magic numbers, and leaked secrets. TRIGGERS - hardcode audit, magic numbers, PLR2004, secret scanning.