escalation-brief
Prepare structured escalation packages for engineering, product, security, or leadership with reproduction steps, business impact, and full context. Activate when a support issue needs to go beyond the support team, when writing an escalation document, when evaluating whether a problem warrants escalation, or when tracking follow-through after handing off an issue.
What this skill does
## Deciding: Escalate or Resolve In-House? ### Keep It in Support When: - A documented fix or known workaround addresses the problem - The root cause is a configuration or setup error you can correct - The customer needs coaching or training, not a product change - The limitation is documented and an alternative path exists - Historical tickets with the same profile were resolved at the support tier ### Escalate When: - **Technical barrier**: A confirmed defect needs a code-level fix, infrastructure-level investigation is required, or data has been lost or corrupted - **Diagnostic ceiling**: The issue exceeds support tooling or access, involves a custom deployment, or demands database-level inspection - **Widespread harm**: Multiple customers are reporting the same problem, production is down, data integrity is compromised, or a security threat exists - **Business stakes**: A high-value account is at risk, an SLA has been breached or is about to be, or the customer is requesting leadership involvement - **Stalled progress**: The issue has sat open past SLA, the customer has waited an unreasonable duration, or standard troubleshooting is not advancing - **Recurring pattern**: Three or more independent reports of the same symptom, a previously-patched issue has resurfaced, or severity is trending upward over time ## Escalation Destinations ### Support L1 to Support L2 **Sender:** Frontline support agent **Receiver:** Senior support / technical specialists **Trigger:** Deeper investigation, specialized product expertise, or advanced debugging is needed **Package contents:** Issue summary, troubleshooting already performed, customer context ### Support L2 to Engineering **Sender:** Senior support **Receiver:** Owning engineering squad **Trigger:** Confirmed defect, infrastructure fault, code change required, system-level inspection needed **Package contents:** Complete reproduction procedure, environment specifics, relevant logs and error output, business impact statement, customer-facing timeline commitments ### Support L2 to Product **Sender:** Senior support **Receiver:** Product management **Trigger:** Capability gap causing pain, design-level decision needed, workflow mismatch, competing priorities across customers **Package contents:** Customer use case narrative, business impact, request frequency, competitive context if available ### Any Tier to Security **Sender:** Any support agent **Receiver:** Security team **Trigger:** Possible data exposure, unauthorized access report, vulnerability disclosure, compliance risk **Package contents:** Observations, affected parties/systems, containment measures already taken, urgency rating **Rule:** Security escalations skip tier progression entirely -- route immediately regardless of your level. ### Any Tier to Leadership **Sender:** Typically L2 or a support manager **Receiver:** Support leadership or executive staff **Trigger:** High-ARR customer signaling churn, SLA breach on a strategic account, cross-functional decision required, policy exception needed, legal or reputational risk **Package contents:** Complete business context, revenue exposure, actions taken to date, the specific decision or intervention needed, hard deadline ## Escalation Document Structure Assemble every escalation using this framework: ``` ESCALATION: [Concise one-line summary] Severity: [Critical / High / Medium] Routed to: [Engineering / Product / Security / Leadership] BUSINESS IMPACT - Affected customers: [Count and names where relevant] - Operational effect: [What is broken for them] - Revenue exposure: [Dollar figure if applicable] - SLA position: [Compliant / At risk / Breached] PROBLEM NARRATIVE [3-5 sentences covering: what is happening, when it began, how it presents, and how wide the blast radius is] REPRODUCTION PROCEDURE (for defects) 1. [Step] 2. [Step] 3. [Step] Expected outcome: [X] Observed outcome: [Y] Environment: [Browser, OS, plan tier, feature flags, etc.] ACTIONS ALREADY TAKEN 1. [What was tried] -> [Outcome] 2. [What was tried] -> [Outcome] 3. [What was tried] -> [Outcome] CUSTOMER COMMUNICATION STATUS - Most recent update: [Date and summary] - Customer expectation: [What they believe will happen and by when] - Further escalation risk: [Likelihood customer escalates beyond you] REQUEST - [Precise ask: investigate / ship a fix / make a decision / approve an exception] - Hard deadline: [Date/time] ATTACHMENTS AND REFERENCES - [Ticket URLs] - [Internal discussion threads] - [Log files, screenshots, recordings] ``` ## Quantifying Business Impact Vague escalations get deprioritized. Anchor every escalation with measurable impact across these dimensions: | Dimension | Key Questions | |-----------|--------------| | **Breadth** | How many customers or end users are affected? Is the number growing? | | **Depth** | Are they fully blocked or merely inconvenienced? | | **Duration** | How long has this persisted? When does it become critical? | | **Revenue** | What ARR is exposed? Are pipeline deals at risk? | | **Reputation** | Could this reach social media or press? Is a reference account involved? | | **Contractual** | Are SLA terms being violated? Do contractual penalties apply? | ### Quick Severity Definitions - **Critical**: Service down, data at risk, active security incident, or multiple high-value accounts impacted. Demands immediate action. - **High**: Core functionality broken, key customer blocked, SLA threshold approaching. Requires same-day engagement. - **Medium**: Significant issue but a viable workaround exists; business impact is real but not time-critical. Needs resolution within the current week. ## Crafting Effective Reproduction Steps Precise reproduction instructions are the highest-value component of any defect escalation. 1. **Establish the baseline state**: Describe account type, configuration, permissions, and any prerequisites. 2. **Use exact actions**: "Select the Export CSV button in the upper-right corner of the Reports view" not "try exporting." 3. **Specify literal inputs**: Provide the actual data values, IDs, or strings used -- not "enter a value." 4. **Record the environment**: Browser and version, operating system, account plan tier, active feature flags. 5. **State the frequency**: Reproducible every time? Intermittent? Only under specific conditions? 6. **Attach evidence**: Screenshots, exact error text, network traces, browser console output. 7. **Document eliminations**: "Reproduced in both Chrome 122 and Safari 17" / "Occurs on both staging and production." ## Post-Escalation Follow-Through Escalation without follow-up is abandonment. Stay engaged: | Severity | Check-in with Receiving Team | Customer-Facing Update | |----------|------------------------------|------------------------| | **Critical** | Every 2 hours | Every 2-4 hours (or per SLA) | | **High** | Every 4 hours | Every 4-8 hours | | **Medium** | Once daily | Every 1-2 business days | ### Ongoing Responsibilities - Proactively contact the receiving team for progress; do not wait to be told. - Update the customer even when there is nothing new: "Investigation is ongoing -- here is what has been confirmed so far." - Re-assess severity if circumstances shift in either direction. - Maintain a running log of all updates in the ticket for auditability. - When resolved: confirm with the customer, close internal tracking, and capture lessons learned. ## Knowing When to De-escalate Escalation is not permanent. Pull an issue back when: - Investigation reveals a cause that support can address directly - A workaround is discovered that fully unblocks the customer - The problem self-resolves (but still document the root cause) - Updated information changes the severity calculus ### De-escalation Procedure - Notify the team that received the escalation - Record the resolution or new status in the ticket - Communicate the outcome to the customer - Document findings so future agents benefi
Related in Security
mac-ops
IncludedComprehensive macOS workstation operations — diagnose kernel panics, identify failing drives, audit launchd startup items, decode wake reasons, triage TCC permission denials, manage APFS snapshots, recover from no-boot. Use for: Mac is slow, slow bootup, won't boot, kernel panic, kernel_task hot, mds_stores CPU, photoanalysisd, cloudd, login loop, gray screen, sleep wake failure, drive failing, IO errors, APFS snapshots eating space, Time Machine local snapshots, Spotlight indexing, launchd, LaunchAgent, LaunchDaemon, login items, TCC permissions, Full Disk Access, Screen Recording denied, Gatekeeper, quarantine, com.apple.quarantine, app is damaged, helper tool, /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools, pmset, wake reasons, dark wake, sysdiagnose, panic.ips, DiagnosticReports, configuration profile, MDM profile, remote diagnostics over SSH.
a11y-audit
IncludedRun accessibility audits on web projects combining automated scanning (axe-core, Lighthouse) with WCAG 2.1 AA compliance mapping, manual check guidance, and structured reporting. Output is configurable: markdown report only, markdown plus machine-readable JSON, or markdown plus issue tracker integration. Use this skill whenever the user mentions "accessibility audit", "a11y audit", "WCAG audit", "accessibility check", "compliance scan", or asks to check a web project for accessibility issues. Also trigger when the user wants to verify WCAG conformance or map findings to a specific standard (CAN-ASC-6.2, EN 301 549, ADA/AODA).
erpclaw
IncludedAI-native ERP system with self-extending OS. Full accounting, invoicing, inventory, purchasing, tax, billing, HR, payroll, advanced accounting (ASC 606/842, intercompany, consolidation), and financial reporting. 413 actions across 14 domains, 43 expansion modules. Constitutional guardrails, adversarial audit, schema migration. Double-entry GL, immutable audit trail, US GAAP.
assess
IncludedAssesses and rates quality 0-10 across multiple dimensions (correctness, maintainability, security, performance, testability, simplicity) with pros/cons analysis. Compares against project conventions and prior decisions from memory. Produces structured evaluation reports with actionable improvement suggestions. Use when evaluating code, designs, architectures, or comparing alternative approaches.
spring-boot-security-jwt
IncludedProvides JWT authentication and authorization patterns for Spring Boot 3.5.x covering token generation with JJWT, Bearer/cookie authentication, database/OAuth2 integration, and RBAC/permission-based access control using Spring Security 6.x. Use when implementing authentication or authorization in Spring Boot applications.
code-hardcode-audit
IncludedDetect hardcoded values, magic numbers, and leaked secrets. TRIGGERS - hardcode audit, magic numbers, PLR2004, secret scanning.