semgrep
Run Semgrep static analysis scan on a codebase using parallel subagents. Supports two scan modes — "run all" (full ruleset coverage) and "important only" (high-confidence security vulnerabilities). Automatically detects and uses Semgrep Pro for cross-file taint analysis when available. Use when asked to scan code for vulnerabilities, run a security audit with Semgrep, find bugs, or perform static analysis. Spawns parallel workers for multi-language codebases.
What this skill does
# Semgrep Security Scan
Run a Semgrep scan with automatic language detection, parallel execution via Task subagents, and merged SARIF output.
## Essential Principles
1. **Always use `--metrics=off`** — Semgrep sends telemetry by default; `--config auto` also phones home. Every `semgrep` command must include `--metrics=off` to prevent data leakage during security audits.
2. **User must approve the scan plan (Step 3 is a hard gate)** — The original "scan this codebase" request is NOT approval. Present exact rulesets, target, engine, and mode; wait for explicit "yes"/"proceed" before spawning scanners.
3. **Third-party rulesets are required, not optional** — Trail of Bits, 0xdea, and Decurity rules catch vulnerabilities absent from the official registry. Include them whenever the detected language matches.
4. **Spawn all scan Tasks in a single message** — Parallel execution is the core performance advantage. Never spawn Tasks sequentially; always emit all Task tool calls in one response.
5. **Always check for Semgrep Pro before scanning** — Pro enables cross-file taint tracking and catches ~250% more true positives. Skipping the check means silently missing critical inter-file vulnerabilities.
## When to Use
- Security audit of a codebase
- Finding vulnerabilities before code review
- Scanning for known bug patterns
- First-pass static analysis
## When NOT to Use
- Binary analysis → Use binary analysis tools
- Already have Semgrep CI configured → Use existing pipeline
- Need cross-file analysis but no Pro license → Consider CodeQL as alternative
- Creating custom Semgrep rules → Use `semgrep-rule-creator` skill
- Porting existing rules to other languages → Use `semgrep-rule-variant-creator` skill
## Output Directory
All scan results, SARIF files, and temporary data are stored in a single output directory.
- **If the user specifies an output directory** in their prompt, use it as `OUTPUT_DIR`.
- **If not specified**, default to `./static_analysis_semgrep_1`. If that already exists, increment to `_2`, `_3`, etc.
In both cases, **always create the directory** with `mkdir -p` before writing any files.
```bash
# Resolve output directory
if [ -n "$USER_SPECIFIED_DIR" ]; then
OUTPUT_DIR="$USER_SPECIFIED_DIR"
else
BASE="static_analysis_semgrep"
N=1
while [ -e "${BASE}_${N}" ]; do
N=$((N + 1))
done
OUTPUT_DIR="${BASE}_${N}"
fi
mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR/raw" "$OUTPUT_DIR/results"
```
The output directory is resolved **once** at the start of Step 1 and used throughout all subsequent steps.
```
$OUTPUT_DIR/
├── rulesets.txt # Approved rulesets (logged after Step 3)
├── raw/ # Per-scan raw output (unfiltered)
│ ├── python-python.json
│ ├── python-python.sarif
│ ├── python-django.json
│ ├── python-django.sarif
│ └── ...
└── results/ # Final merged output
└── results.sarif
```
## Prerequisites
**Required:** Semgrep CLI (`semgrep --version`). If not installed, see [Semgrep installation docs](https://semgrep.dev/docs/getting-started/).
**Optional:** Semgrep Pro — enables cross-file taint tracking, inter-procedural analysis, and additional languages (Apex, C#, Elixir). Check with:
```bash
semgrep --pro --validate --config p/default 2>/dev/null && echo "Pro available" || echo "OSS only"
```
**Limitations:** OSS mode cannot track data flow across files. Pro mode uses `-j 1` for cross-file analysis (slower per ruleset, but parallel rulesets compensate).
## Scan Modes
Select mode in Step 2 of the workflow. Mode affects both scanner flags and post-processing.
| Mode | Coverage | Findings Reported |
|------|----------|-------------------|
| **Run all** | All rulesets, all severity levels | Everything |
| **Important only** | All rulesets, pre- and post-filtered | Security vulns only, medium-high confidence/impact |
**Important only** applies two filter layers:
1. **Pre-filter**: `--severity MEDIUM --severity HIGH --severity CRITICAL` (CLI flag)
2. **Post-filter**: JSON metadata — keeps only `category=security`, `confidence∈{MEDIUM,HIGH}`, `impact∈{MEDIUM,HIGH}`
See [scan-modes.md](references/scan-modes.md) for metadata criteria and jq filter commands.
## Orchestration Architecture
```
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MAIN AGENT (this skill) │
│ Step 1: Detect languages + check Pro availability │
│ Step 2: Select scan mode + rulesets (ref: rulesets.md) │
│ Step 3: Present plan + rulesets, get approval [⛔ HARD GATE] │
│ Step 4: Spawn parallel scan Tasks (approved rulesets + mode) │
│ Step 5: Merge results and report │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ Step 4
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ Scan Tasks │
│ (parallel) │
├─────────────────┤
│ Python scanner │
│ JS/TS scanner │
│ Go scanner │
│ Docker scanner │
└─────────────────┘
```
## Workflow
**Follow the detailed workflow in [scan-workflow.md](workflows/scan-workflow.md).** Summary:
| Step | Action | Gate | Key Reference |
|------|--------|------|---------------|
| 1 | Resolve output dir, detect languages + Pro availability | — | Use Glob, not Bash |
| 2 | Select scan mode + rulesets | — | [rulesets.md](references/rulesets.md) |
| 3 | Present plan, get explicit approval | ⛔ HARD | AskUserQuestion |
| 4 | Spawn parallel scan Tasks | — | [scanner-task-prompt.md](references/scanner-task-prompt.md) |
| 5 | Merge results and report | — | Merge script (below) |
**Task enforcement:** On invocation, create 5 tasks with blockedBy dependencies (each step blocks the previous). Step 3 is a HARD GATE — mark complete ONLY after user explicitly approves.
**Merge command (Step 5):**
```bash
uv run {baseDir}/scripts/merge_sarif.py $OUTPUT_DIR/raw $OUTPUT_DIR/results/results.sarif
```
## Agents
| Agent | Tools | Purpose |
|-------|-------|---------|
| `static-analysis:semgrep-scanner` | Bash | Executes parallel semgrep scans for a language category |
Use `subagent_type: static-analysis:semgrep-scanner` in Step 4 when spawning Task subagents.
## Rationalizations to Reject
| Shortcut | Why It's Wrong |
|----------|----------------|
| "User asked for scan, that's approval" | Original request ≠ plan approval. Present plan, use AskUserQuestion, await explicit "yes" |
| "Step 3 task is blocking, just mark complete" | Lying about task status defeats enforcement. Only mark complete after real approval |
| "I already know what they want" | Assumptions cause scanning wrong directories/rulesets. Present plan for verification |
| "Just use default rulesets" | User must see and approve exact rulesets before scan |
| "Add extra rulesets without asking" | Modifying approved list without consent breaks trust |
| "Third-party rulesets are optional" | Trail of Bits, 0xdea, Decurity catch vulnerabilities not in official registry — REQUIRED |
| "Use --config auto" | Sends metrics; less control over rulesets |
| "One Task at a time" | Defeats parallelism; spawn all Tasks together |
| "Pro is too slow, skip --pro" | Cross-file analysis catches 250% more true positives; worth the time |
| "Semgrep handles GitHub URLs natively" | URL handling fails on repos with non-standard YAML; always clone first |
| "Cleanup is optional" | Cloned repos pollute the user's workspace and accumulate across runs |
| "Use `.` or relative path as target" | Subagents need absolute paths to avoid ambiguity |
| "Let the user pick an output dir later" | Output directory must be resolved at Step 1, before any files are created |
## Reference Index
| File | Content |
|------|---------|
| [rulesets.md](references/rulesets.md) | Complete ruleset catalog and selection algorithm |
| [scan-modes.md](references/scan-modes.md) | Pre/post-filter criteria and jq commands |
| [scanner-task-prompt.md](references/scanner-task-prompt.md) | Template for spawning scanner subagenRelated in Security
mac-ops
IncludedComprehensive macOS workstation operations — diagnose kernel panics, identify failing drives, audit launchd startup items, decode wake reasons, triage TCC permission denials, manage APFS snapshots, recover from no-boot. Use for: Mac is slow, slow bootup, won't boot, kernel panic, kernel_task hot, mds_stores CPU, photoanalysisd, cloudd, login loop, gray screen, sleep wake failure, drive failing, IO errors, APFS snapshots eating space, Time Machine local snapshots, Spotlight indexing, launchd, LaunchAgent, LaunchDaemon, login items, TCC permissions, Full Disk Access, Screen Recording denied, Gatekeeper, quarantine, com.apple.quarantine, app is damaged, helper tool, /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools, pmset, wake reasons, dark wake, sysdiagnose, panic.ips, DiagnosticReports, configuration profile, MDM profile, remote diagnostics over SSH.
a11y-audit
IncludedRun accessibility audits on web projects combining automated scanning (axe-core, Lighthouse) with WCAG 2.1 AA compliance mapping, manual check guidance, and structured reporting. Output is configurable: markdown report only, markdown plus machine-readable JSON, or markdown plus issue tracker integration. Use this skill whenever the user mentions "accessibility audit", "a11y audit", "WCAG audit", "accessibility check", "compliance scan", or asks to check a web project for accessibility issues. Also trigger when the user wants to verify WCAG conformance or map findings to a specific standard (CAN-ASC-6.2, EN 301 549, ADA/AODA).
erpclaw
IncludedAI-native ERP system with self-extending OS. Full accounting, invoicing, inventory, purchasing, tax, billing, HR, payroll, advanced accounting (ASC 606/842, intercompany, consolidation), and financial reporting. 413 actions across 14 domains, 43 expansion modules. Constitutional guardrails, adversarial audit, schema migration. Double-entry GL, immutable audit trail, US GAAP.
assess
IncludedAssesses and rates quality 0-10 across multiple dimensions (correctness, maintainability, security, performance, testability, simplicity) with pros/cons analysis. Compares against project conventions and prior decisions from memory. Produces structured evaluation reports with actionable improvement suggestions. Use when evaluating code, designs, architectures, or comparing alternative approaches.
spring-boot-security-jwt
IncludedProvides JWT authentication and authorization patterns for Spring Boot 3.5.x covering token generation with JJWT, Bearer/cookie authentication, database/OAuth2 integration, and RBAC/permission-based access control using Spring Security 6.x. Use when implementing authentication or authorization in Spring Boot applications.
code-hardcode-audit
IncludedDetect hardcoded values, magic numbers, and leaked secrets. TRIGGERS - hardcode audit, magic numbers, PLR2004, secret scanning.