vendor-security-questionnaire
Automated vendor security assessment through questionnaire generation, response parsing, and risk scoring
What this skill does
# Vendor Security Questionnaire Skill
## Purpose
Automate vendor security assessment through standardized questionnaire generation, response parsing, security posture scoring, and risk report generation for third-party risk management programs.
## Capabilities
### Questionnaire Generation
- Generate industry-standard security questionnaires
- Create SIG (Standardized Information Gathering) questionnaires
- Build CAIQ (Consensus Assessment Initiative Questionnaire) forms
- Generate custom questionnaires based on risk tier
- Create vendor-type-specific assessments
- Support multiple response formats
### Response Parsing and Analysis
- Parse questionnaire responses from various formats
- Extract key security control information
- Identify missing or incomplete responses
- Flag concerning answers for review
- Compare responses against requirements
- Validate evidence attachments
### Security Posture Scoring
- Calculate vendor security scores
- Weight scores by control importance
- Compare against industry benchmarks
- Track score trends over time
- Generate risk-adjusted ratings
- Identify score improvement areas
### Assessment Status Tracking
- Track assessment workflow status
- Monitor response deadlines
- Send automated reminders
- Escalate overdue assessments
- Maintain assessment history
- Archive completed assessments
### Risk Report Generation
- Generate executive risk summaries
- Create detailed technical reports
- Produce comparison reports
- Build risk heat maps
- Generate board-level dashboards
- Export data for GRC systems
### Vendor Compliance Monitoring
- Track vendor compliance commitments
- Monitor remediation progress
- Verify evidence of compliance
- Alert on compliance drift
- Schedule periodic reassessments
- Maintain compliance documentation
## Questionnaire Standards
| Standard | Use Case | Questions |
|----------|----------|-----------|
| SIG Lite | Low-risk vendors | ~100 |
| SIG Core | Medium-risk vendors | ~300 |
| SIG Full | High-risk vendors | ~800+ |
| CAIQ | Cloud providers | ~300 |
| VSAQ | General vendors | Variable |
| Custom | Specific needs | Variable |
## Assessment Domains
- Information Security Management
- Access Control
- Data Protection
- Network Security
- Application Security
- Physical Security
- Business Continuity
- Incident Response
- Compliance and Legal
- Third-Party Management
## Integrations
- **OneTrust**: Third-party risk management
- **ProcessUnity**: Vendor risk management
- **SecurityScorecard**: Security ratings
- **BitSight**: Security ratings and benchmarks
- **Prevalent**: Third-party risk intelligence
- **Shared Assessments**: SIG questionnaire tools
## Target Processes
- Third-Party Vendor Security Assessment
- Vendor Onboarding Security Review
- Annual Vendor Reassessment
- Vendor Risk Management
## Input Schema
```json
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"operation": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["generate", "parse", "score", "report", "track"],
"description": "Questionnaire operation type"
},
"vendorInfo": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"vendorName": { "type": "string" },
"vendorId": { "type": "string" },
"vendorType": { "type": "string" },
"riskTier": { "type": "string", "enum": ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"] },
"dataAccess": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } }
}
},
"questionnaireType": {
"type": "string",
"enum": ["SIG-Lite", "SIG-Core", "SIG-Full", "CAIQ", "VSAQ", "custom"],
"description": "Questionnaire standard to use"
},
"customDomains": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" },
"description": "Specific domains to assess"
},
"responseFile": {
"type": "string",
"description": "Path to questionnaire response file"
},
"scoringCriteria": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"minimumScore": { "type": "number" },
"criticalControls": { "type": "array" },
"weightings": { "type": "object" }
}
},
"deadline": {
"type": "string",
"format": "date",
"description": "Assessment completion deadline"
}
},
"required": ["operation"]
}
```
## Output Schema
```json
{
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"assessmentId": {
"type": "string"
},
"operation": {
"type": "string"
},
"timestamp": {
"type": "string",
"format": "date-time"
},
"vendorInfo": {
"type": "object"
},
"questionnaire": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"type": { "type": "string" },
"totalQuestions": { "type": "integer" },
"domains": { "type": "array" },
"filePath": { "type": "string" }
}
},
"responseAnalysis": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"questionsAnswered": { "type": "integer" },
"questionsSkipped": { "type": "integer" },
"evidenceProvided": { "type": "integer" },
"concerningResponses": { "type": "array" },
"missingInformation": { "type": "array" }
}
},
"securityScore": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"overallScore": { "type": "number" },
"riskRating": { "type": "string", "enum": ["low", "medium", "high", "critical"] },
"domainScores": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"domain": { "type": "string" },
"score": { "type": "number" },
"findings": { "type": "array" }
}
}
},
"benchmarkComparison": { "type": "object" },
"scoreHistory": { "type": "array" }
}
},
"riskFindings": {
"type": "array",
"items": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"findingId": { "type": "string" },
"domain": { "type": "string" },
"severity": { "type": "string" },
"description": { "type": "string" },
"recommendation": { "type": "string" }
}
}
},
"assessmentStatus": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"status": { "type": "string" },
"deadline": { "type": "string" },
"daysRemaining": { "type": "integer" },
"remindersent": { "type": "boolean" }
}
},
"recommendations": {
"type": "array",
"items": { "type": "string" }
},
"reportPath": {
"type": "string"
}
}
}
```
## Usage Example
```javascript
skill: {
name: 'vendor-security-questionnaire',
context: {
operation: 'generate',
vendorInfo: {
vendorName: 'Cloud SaaS Provider',
riskTier: 'high',
dataAccess: ['PII', 'financial']
},
questionnaireType: 'SIG-Core',
deadline: '2024-03-15'
}
}
```
Related in Security
mac-ops
IncludedComprehensive macOS workstation operations — diagnose kernel panics, identify failing drives, audit launchd startup items, decode wake reasons, triage TCC permission denials, manage APFS snapshots, recover from no-boot. Use for: Mac is slow, slow bootup, won't boot, kernel panic, kernel_task hot, mds_stores CPU, photoanalysisd, cloudd, login loop, gray screen, sleep wake failure, drive failing, IO errors, APFS snapshots eating space, Time Machine local snapshots, Spotlight indexing, launchd, LaunchAgent, LaunchDaemon, login items, TCC permissions, Full Disk Access, Screen Recording denied, Gatekeeper, quarantine, com.apple.quarantine, app is damaged, helper tool, /Library/PrivilegedHelperTools, pmset, wake reasons, dark wake, sysdiagnose, panic.ips, DiagnosticReports, configuration profile, MDM profile, remote diagnostics over SSH.
a11y-audit
IncludedRun accessibility audits on web projects combining automated scanning (axe-core, Lighthouse) with WCAG 2.1 AA compliance mapping, manual check guidance, and structured reporting. Output is configurable: markdown report only, markdown plus machine-readable JSON, or markdown plus issue tracker integration. Use this skill whenever the user mentions "accessibility audit", "a11y audit", "WCAG audit", "accessibility check", "compliance scan", or asks to check a web project for accessibility issues. Also trigger when the user wants to verify WCAG conformance or map findings to a specific standard (CAN-ASC-6.2, EN 301 549, ADA/AODA).
erpclaw
IncludedAI-native ERP system with self-extending OS. Full accounting, invoicing, inventory, purchasing, tax, billing, HR, payroll, advanced accounting (ASC 606/842, intercompany, consolidation), and financial reporting. 413 actions across 14 domains, 43 expansion modules. Constitutional guardrails, adversarial audit, schema migration. Double-entry GL, immutable audit trail, US GAAP.
assess
IncludedAssesses and rates quality 0-10 across multiple dimensions (correctness, maintainability, security, performance, testability, simplicity) with pros/cons analysis. Compares against project conventions and prior decisions from memory. Produces structured evaluation reports with actionable improvement suggestions. Use when evaluating code, designs, architectures, or comparing alternative approaches.
spring-boot-security-jwt
IncludedProvides JWT authentication and authorization patterns for Spring Boot 3.5.x covering token generation with JJWT, Bearer/cookie authentication, database/OAuth2 integration, and RBAC/permission-based access control using Spring Security 6.x. Use when implementing authentication or authorization in Spring Boot applications.
code-hardcode-audit
IncludedDetect hardcoded values, magic numbers, and leaked secrets. TRIGGERS - hardcode audit, magic numbers, PLR2004, secret scanning.